<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disabling useless services for speeding up your computer &#8211; Modifications for the corporate computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, ramblings, rantings of Renganathan Ramamoorthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guru Panguji</title>
		<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guru Panguji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 05:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gurupanguji.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opera is good, no denying that. However, for the user who likes a good looking tabbed browser, Fx takes the cake. Agreed there are still many bugs, there are areas to improve! 

But, as far as Fx is concerned, everything is so much simpler. Furthermore, the automatic detection of proxy present in the 1.5+ is a good thing, actually one of the best things that Fx has done in its fight with the other browsers.

The extensions that you can add to Fx is so much simpler in process than Opera. Also, somehow, at least to my eye, the Fx look and feel is comfy! :-D!

I know Browser and browser wars are present. I now have FX and IE 7.0 Beta 1 installed in my system. Still, Fx 1.5 works way better and gives a faster browsing feeling than any of the other browsers that I have tried and used.

Flock was k, but it sucks as compared to the Fx feel. Furthermore, the &lt;i&gt;noveau&lt;/i&gt; concept of starred, tagged bookmarks, bombed in front of me, inspite of its innovativeness!

Flock was there for 2 then, i just took it off, as it was a bloody pain maintaing the bookmarks :-D!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is good, no denying that. However, for the user who likes a good looking tabbed browser, Fx takes the cake. Agreed there are still many bugs, there are areas to improve! </p>
<p>But, as far as Fx is concerned, everything is so much simpler. Furthermore, the automatic detection of proxy present in the 1.5+ is a good thing, actually one of the best things that Fx has done in its fight with the other browsers.</p>
<p>The extensions that you can add to Fx is so much simpler in process than Opera. Also, somehow, at least to my eye, the Fx look and feel is comfy! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> !</p>
<p>I know Browser and browser wars are present. I now have FX and IE 7.0 Beta 1 installed in my system. Still, Fx 1.5 works way better and gives a faster browsing feeling than any of the other browsers that I have tried and used.</p>
<p>Flock was k, but it sucks as compared to the Fx feel. Furthermore, the <i>noveau</i> concept of starred, tagged bookmarks, bombed in front of me, inspite of its innovativeness!</p>
<p>Flock was there for 2 then, i just took it off, as it was a bloody pain maintaing the bookmarks <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sukhi</title>
		<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sukhi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gurupanguji.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[qwerty,

Opera scores big over Firefox, by its ability to recover from crashes - will prompt to open the previous tabs/sites before it crashed or was killed. Firefox doesnt even have an option for that(at least none that I am aware of) - you have to manually bookmark all tabs - which is impossible when it crashes.

IMO 80% of the people dont need much else than standard Ffox - with perhaps adblock being one thing they might covet. So Opera to Ffox hardly should make a difference.

Also, for eg., IE 7&#039;s anti-phishing engine(w/e its called) is much more useful than Firefox&#039;s IP spouting extension (4got what its called, again!).

I&#039;d stick my neck out and say Ffox 0.8 is closer to Opera 8.5 than Ffox 1.5 (security issues notwithstanding)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qwerty,</p>
<p>Opera scores big over Firefox, by its ability to recover from crashes &#8211; will prompt to open the previous tabs/sites before it crashed or was killed. Firefox doesnt even have an option for that(at least none that I am aware of) &#8211; you have to manually bookmark all tabs &#8211; which is impossible when it crashes.</p>
<p>IMO 80% of the people dont need much else than standard Ffox &#8211; with perhaps adblock being one thing they might covet. So Opera to Ffox hardly should make a difference.</p>
<p>Also, for eg., IE 7&#8242;s anti-phishing engine(w/e its called) is much more useful than Firefox&#8217;s IP spouting extension (4got what its called, again!).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d stick my neck out and say Ffox 0.8 is closer to Opera 8.5 than Ffox 1.5 (security issues notwithstanding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qwerty Maniac</title>
		<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qwerty Maniac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gurupanguji.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol, just noticed, your edit is excellent, very humourous too :D thanks for making a corp. version of it :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, just noticed, your edit is excellent, very humourous too <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  thanks for making a corp. version of it <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qwerty Maniac</title>
		<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qwerty Maniac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gurupanguji.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only reason I like FX is its amazing ability to render pages and its fast page load speeds by displaying text first. Opera IMO only looks good and is a lil more fast than FX. But since I dont use voice and widgets I dont seem to like its features. Also it doesnt offer the flexiblity that an open source browser provides. (Like flock, fx, mozilla)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I like FX is its amazing ability to render pages and its fast page load speeds by displaying text first. Opera IMO only looks good and is a lil more fast than FX. But since I dont use voice and widgets I dont seem to like its features. Also it doesnt offer the flexiblity that an open source browser provides. (Like flock, fx, mozilla)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sukhi</title>
		<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sukhi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gurupanguji.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the rule generally is that you do NOT tamper with your corporate desktop, except for installing say stuff like Firefox, and/or applications that you use for your work/project. 

And yes folks do need to change the settings based on their own experience, and needs. 

winamp is better than win media player, but compared to Music match jukebox it sux. and winamp 2.8 is much better than 5.x, imo. the thing that has me going for winamp is the keyboard shortcuts!(esply &#039;J&#039;) :-)

Firefox 1.5 has more problems than pre-release 0.8. It sux majorly. The only reason to use it, is when you need auto-detection of proxies - something Opera doesnt have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the rule generally is that you do NOT tamper with your corporate desktop, except for installing say stuff like Firefox, and/or applications that you use for your work/project. </p>
<p>And yes folks do need to change the settings based on their own experience, and needs. </p>
<p>winamp is better than win media player, but compared to Music match jukebox it sux. and winamp 2.8 is much better than 5.x, imo. the thing that has me going for winamp is the keyboard shortcuts!(esply &#8216;J&#8217;) <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Firefox 1.5 has more problems than pre-release 0.8. It sux majorly. The only reason to use it, is when you need auto-detection of proxies &#8211; something Opera doesnt have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guru Panguji</title>
		<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guru Panguji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gurupanguji.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Qwerty: You are welcome! That was a crisp, clean article :-)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Qwerty: You are welcome! That was a crisp, clean article <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qwerty Maniac</title>
		<link>http://blog.gurupanguji.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qwerty Maniac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gurupanguji.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/disabling-useless-services-for-speeding-up-your-computer-modifications-for-the-corporate-computers/#comment-296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the trackback and acknowledgement pal! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the trackback and acknowledgement pal! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

